NexisChat Docs
Spec Kit Integration

Customization & Best Practices

Extending Spec Kit workflows—prompt tuning, artifact governance, automation, and scaling patterns.

This guide outlines how to evolve the Spec Kit integration as NexisChat grows—tuning prompts, automating validation, scaling artifact management, and enabling multi-agent collaboration.

Guiding Principles

PrincipleWhy It Matters
Intent Before ImplementationPrevent scope creep & misaligned architecture
Deterministic ArtifactsEasier diff/review; lowers ambiguity for AI
Minimal Stable SurfaceOnly bake durable policies into constitution/prompts
Regenerate IntentionallyAvoid drift by upstreaming changes rather than ad-hoc patches
Small, Observable IncrementsFaster feedback loops & reduced merge conflict risk

Prompt Tuning Strategy

GoalTechniqueExample
Increase structural consistencyAdd numbered required sections"Return sections 1–8 exactly; omit others"
Reduce hallucinated scopeAdd explicit negative constraints"Do NOT introduce authentication primitives unless spec defines them"
Encourage alternativesAsk for variants with trade-offs"Provide 2 plan options: baseline vs. queue-backed"
Improve edge case coverageRequire explicit table"Add an Edge Cases table with Trigger / Expected Behavior"

Keep prompts under size thresholds to avoid truncation; move large constant policies into constitution.

Constitution Management

Add a Changelog section at bottom of memory/constitution.md:

### Change Log
- 2025-09-10: Added rule enforcing feature flags for experimental UI flows.

Perform monthly review (or sooner if major architecture shifts). Remove obsolete guidance to reduce noise.

Artifact Lifecycle

StageActionOwnership
DraftGenerated by AI, refined via reviewFeature Owner
ApprovedStored & versioned in repoMaintainer / Reviewer
AmendedUpstream change triggers regenerationMaintainer + Owner
ArchivedDeprecated feature or replaced designArchitecture Lead

Consider prefixing archived artifacts with archive__ or relocate to /archive/.

Scaling Tasks

When task lists exceed ~100 items:

  • Group by workstream (e.g., API, UI, Infra, Migrations)
  • Maintain a master index referencing sub-task files
  • Add progress markers (e.g., [37/112 complete] auto-updated via script)

Automation Ideas

AutomationValue
Lint: required spec sectionsStops incomplete artifacts early
Plan diff toolCompare alternative architectures programmatically
Task size heuristicWarn if task may exceed LOC threshold
Constitution hash checkWarn if changed without checklist update
Edge case enumeratorScript to scan for "Edge Cases" heading presence
make feature slug=team-workspaces        # scaffold spec/plan/tasks
make plan slug=team-workspaces           # run setup-plan + open plan file
make tasks slug=team-workspaces          # generate tasks after plan approval
make validate-artifacts                  # run custom lint checks

Multi-Agent & Parallelism

If multiple AI agents (e.g., Copilot + Claude) are used:

  • Standardize artifact contract so outputs are interchangeable.
  • Use a /_agent/ metadata block in artifacts capturing: model, temperature, date.
  • Diff alternative implementations before selecting (store losing variants briefly for rationale capture).

Testing Alignment

Embed references to test strategy per task:

- [ ] Add unit tests (services)
- [ ] Add integration tests (API endpoints)
- [ ] Add contract tests (schema payload variants)

Automate validation: fail CI if new feature merges without at least one test file touched unless explicitly exempted (label: test-exempt).

Observability Integration

During /plan phase require explicit:

  • Metrics (counters, histograms)
  • Logs (structured keys)
  • Traces (critical spans)

Reject plans missing an Observability section unless intentionally trivial.

Security & Compliance Hooks

Add to prompts once stable:

  • Data classification tags per data model
  • Threat model sketch (STRIDE table)
  • Access control matrix (Role x Action)

Refactoring & Modernization

For legacy modules:

  1. Capture existing behavior spec first (reverse spec)
  2. Propose modernization plan (parallel variant acceptable)
  3. Generate tasks for strangler pattern migration

Metrics to Track

MetricDefinitionWhy
Spec Iteration CountNumber of revisions pre-approvalDetect over-churn or under-review
Avg Task Cycle TimeStart → mergedFlow efficiency
Regeneration FrequencySpec/plan rework per featureArchitectural stability signal
Task Size DistributionLOC per task diffScope health

Smarter Context Engineering (Future)

  • Generate dependency graphs & embed summaries in plan context.
  • Summarize frequently imported modules (size/touch frequency).
  • Auto-extract data models and feed into /plan.

Adoption Playbook

PhaseGoalIndicator
PilotValidate workflow valueReduced rework comments in PRs
ExpansionOnboard more contributorsIncreased spec artifacts per sprint
MaturityNormalize regeneration disciplineStable regeneration frequency

Pitfalls & Mitigations

PitfallMitigation
Over-specifying trivial featuresApply lightweight template variant
Stale constitution entriesQuarterly pruning session
Ignoring open questionsBlock plan approval until answered or deferred explicitly
Task avalanche (too granular)Minimum size heuristic / merge tasks

Quick Checklist (Feature Kickoff)

[ ] /specify complete & reviewed
[ ] /plan approved (constraints aligned)
[ ] /tasks granular & validated
[ ] Observability & security sections present
[ ] Constitution still applicable (no contradictions)
[ ] Automation lint passes

Enhance this doc as we implement automation or adopt new AI workflows.