Customization & Best Practices
Extending Spec Kit workflows—prompt tuning, artifact governance, automation, and scaling patterns.
This guide outlines how to evolve the Spec Kit integration as NexisChat grows—tuning prompts, automating validation, scaling artifact management, and enabling multi-agent collaboration.
Guiding Principles
| Principle | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Intent Before Implementation | Prevent scope creep & misaligned architecture |
| Deterministic Artifacts | Easier diff/review; lowers ambiguity for AI |
| Minimal Stable Surface | Only bake durable policies into constitution/prompts |
| Regenerate Intentionally | Avoid drift by upstreaming changes rather than ad-hoc patches |
| Small, Observable Increments | Faster feedback loops & reduced merge conflict risk |
Prompt Tuning Strategy
| Goal | Technique | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Increase structural consistency | Add numbered required sections | "Return sections 1–8 exactly; omit others" |
| Reduce hallucinated scope | Add explicit negative constraints | "Do NOT introduce authentication primitives unless spec defines them" |
| Encourage alternatives | Ask for variants with trade-offs | "Provide 2 plan options: baseline vs. queue-backed" |
| Improve edge case coverage | Require explicit table | "Add an Edge Cases table with Trigger / Expected Behavior" |
Keep prompts under size thresholds to avoid truncation; move large constant policies into constitution.
Constitution Management
Add a Changelog section at bottom of memory/constitution.md:
### Change Log
- 2025-09-10: Added rule enforcing feature flags for experimental UI flows.Perform monthly review (or sooner if major architecture shifts). Remove obsolete guidance to reduce noise.
Artifact Lifecycle
| Stage | Action | Ownership |
|---|---|---|
| Draft | Generated by AI, refined via review | Feature Owner |
| Approved | Stored & versioned in repo | Maintainer / Reviewer |
| Amended | Upstream change triggers regeneration | Maintainer + Owner |
| Archived | Deprecated feature or replaced design | Architecture Lead |
Consider prefixing archived artifacts with archive__ or relocate to /archive/.
Scaling Tasks
When task lists exceed ~100 items:
- Group by workstream (e.g., API, UI, Infra, Migrations)
- Maintain a master index referencing sub-task files
- Add progress markers (e.g.,
[37/112 complete]auto-updated via script)
Automation Ideas
| Automation | Value |
|---|---|
| Lint: required spec sections | Stops incomplete artifacts early |
| Plan diff tool | Compare alternative architectures programmatically |
| Task size heuristic | Warn if task may exceed LOC threshold |
| Constitution hash check | Warn if changed without checklist update |
| Edge case enumerator | Script to scan for "Edge Cases" heading presence |
Recommended Make Targets
make feature slug=team-workspaces # scaffold spec/plan/tasks
make plan slug=team-workspaces # run setup-plan + open plan file
make tasks slug=team-workspaces # generate tasks after plan approval
make validate-artifacts # run custom lint checksMulti-Agent & Parallelism
If multiple AI agents (e.g., Copilot + Claude) are used:
- Standardize artifact contract so outputs are interchangeable.
- Use a
/_agent/metadata block in artifacts capturing: model, temperature, date. - Diff alternative implementations before selecting (store losing variants briefly for rationale capture).
Testing Alignment
Embed references to test strategy per task:
- [ ] Add unit tests (services)
- [ ] Add integration tests (API endpoints)
- [ ] Add contract tests (schema payload variants)Automate validation: fail CI if new feature merges without at least one test file touched unless explicitly exempted (label: test-exempt).
Observability Integration
During /plan phase require explicit:
- Metrics (counters, histograms)
- Logs (structured keys)
- Traces (critical spans)
Reject plans missing an Observability section unless intentionally trivial.
Security & Compliance Hooks
Add to prompts once stable:
- Data classification tags per data model
- Threat model sketch (STRIDE table)
- Access control matrix (Role x Action)
Refactoring & Modernization
For legacy modules:
- Capture existing behavior spec first (reverse spec)
- Propose modernization plan (parallel variant acceptable)
- Generate tasks for strangler pattern migration
Metrics to Track
| Metric | Definition | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Spec Iteration Count | Number of revisions pre-approval | Detect over-churn or under-review |
| Avg Task Cycle Time | Start → merged | Flow efficiency |
| Regeneration Frequency | Spec/plan rework per feature | Architectural stability signal |
| Task Size Distribution | LOC per task diff | Scope health |
Smarter Context Engineering (Future)
- Generate dependency graphs & embed summaries in plan context.
- Summarize frequently imported modules (size/touch frequency).
- Auto-extract data models and feed into /plan.
Adoption Playbook
| Phase | Goal | Indicator |
|---|---|---|
| Pilot | Validate workflow value | Reduced rework comments in PRs |
| Expansion | Onboard more contributors | Increased spec artifacts per sprint |
| Maturity | Normalize regeneration discipline | Stable regeneration frequency |
Pitfalls & Mitigations
| Pitfall | Mitigation |
|---|---|
| Over-specifying trivial features | Apply lightweight template variant |
| Stale constitution entries | Quarterly pruning session |
| Ignoring open questions | Block plan approval until answered or deferred explicitly |
| Task avalanche (too granular) | Minimum size heuristic / merge tasks |
Quick Checklist (Feature Kickoff)
[ ] /specify complete & reviewed
[ ] /plan approved (constraints aligned)
[ ] /tasks granular & validated
[ ] Observability & security sections present
[ ] Constitution still applicable (no contradictions)
[ ] Automation lint passesEnhance this doc as we implement automation or adopt new AI workflows.